Subject	Thanks, that is the explanation I was looking for
Posted by	ttsmokin on November 15, 2012 at 9:58 PM
	This message has been viewed 137 times.
In Reply To	Depends where you need cooling posted by Broke_as_**** on November 15, 2012 at 09:33 PM
Message	I take my Z to local track days. I'm upgrading to a Mishimoto radiator this season as well as going to the thermostatic full flow oil cooler setup instead of just the factory setup with the Earls plumbed in. So unfortunately none of the info I have from last year would really help me make that decision. But it sounds like I should keep my Earls cooler. Thanks everyone
Follow Ups	Which is a better oil cooler? - ttsmokin 22:56:23 11/14/12 Earls looks better to me (n/m) - aliaZ 11:46:53 11/15/12 I have an Earl/Mocal cooler. - RZturbo 12:18:32 11/15/12 Same here "Earls" (n/m) - njz 12:36:55 11/15/12 looks like the Earls has a greater fin density (n/m) - Shiers69 13:07:47 11/15/12 Re: looks like the Earls has a greater fin density - ttsmokin 15:36:30 11/15/12 More fins = more heat transfer (unless blocked with crud) (n/m) - Ted (92TT) 18:05:04 11/15/12 Depends where you need cooling - Broke_as_**** 21:33:24 11/15/12 Thanks, that is the explanation I was looking for - ttsmokin 21:58:15 11/15/12
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.